IMF slashes US 2025 growth to 1.8 amid Trump Tariffs trade war

IMF slashes US 2025 growth to 1.8 amid Trump Tariffs trade war
Credit: Reuters

Washington (Washington Insider Magazine) – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) produced a significantly reduced projection of US economic growth through 2025 because President Donald Trump has chosen aggressive tariff policies that escalated trade conflicts as major threats to the US economy.

IMF analysts produced a new World Economic Outlook on April 22, where they predicted US GDP expansion would achieve only 1.8%, while previously, they projected 2.7% growth in January. The 0.9 percentage point reduction stands as one of the largest recent modifications to forecasts, which economists trace back to Trump’s tariffs on April 2.

A Perfect Storm of Trade Tensions

The IMF’s chief economist, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, didn’t mince words in his assessment.

The common denominator is that tariffs are a negative supply shock for the economy imposing them,”

Gourinchas wrote in the outlook.

“Resources are reallocated toward the production of noncompetitive goods, with a resulting loss of aggregate productivity, lower activity, and higher production costs and prices.”

The fast-paced reassessment by the IMF represents the drastic worsening of economic conditions. Normally requiring more than two months to compile, this forecast revision was completed in less than 10 days – an unprecedented scramble reflecting what Gourinchas called “the sudden nature of the policy changes.”

After postponing their April 2 reciprocal tariff announcements, the Trump administration failed to save the damage that had already resulted from their trade policies. Retaliatory measures from trading partners and severe market turbulence have created what economists describe as a “confidence shock” that could linger even if the tariffs never take full effect.

Market Carnage and Growing Recession Risks

The trade policy uncertainty triggered a strong negative reaction from financial markets. The S&P 500 dropped 9% following Trump’s April 2 announcement, leading to the elimination of all its yearly gains within only three weeks, according to data from CNBC.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) now projects a 40% likelihood of a US recession during the upcoming year, while their earlier figure was 25%. The fund leader, Gourinchas, stated on Tuesday that substantial risks have grown despite the fund still not forecasting economic contraction.

“The uncertainty could prompt firms to delay investment and reduce purchases,”

he warned, describing a potential negative feedback loop where business caution reinforces economic weakness.

Global Domino Effect

The suffering exists beyond American borders. The International Monetary Fund reduced its global growth prediction from 3.3% to 2.8% when it released its forecast in April 2025. Advanced economies like the United Kingdom and Canada anticipate restricted growth during 2025 because their combined inflation rates increased by 0.4 percentage points to reach 2.5%.

“In particular, the effects of recently imposed tariffs on inflation across countries will depend on whether the tariffs are perceived to be temporary or permanent,”

the outlook noted, highlighting the complex transmission mechanisms of trade conflicts.

Inflation: The Stealth Tax of Trade Wars

According to the IMF report, American consumers face no easing in their high prices. US inflation predictions have increased to 3% for 2025, according to fund data, which originally expected 2% in January.

  • Multiple factors exist that shape the economic outlook according to the projection.
  • Persistent price dynamics in the services sector
  • Core goods inflation has experienced a recent increase when food and energy components are removed from the calculation.
  • The tariff announcements led to supply chain disruptions throughout the affected networks.

“The extent to which firms adjust margins to offset increased import costs and whether imports are invoiced in U.S. dollars or local currency will all influence the ultimate price impacts,”

economists noted, suggesting the full inflationary effects may still be working their way through the system.

Businesses Scramble to Adapt

The annual corporate profits presented this month indicate that the economy is facing significant challenges. The economic uncertainty prompts firms from all sectors to scale down budgets while postponing investments and accumulating financial safety reserves for upcoming challenges.

“Flexibility and liquidity are now the name of the game,” observed one Wall Street analyst who asked not to be named, noting that firms with strong balance sheets may gain competitive advantage in the coming months.

The retail sector appears particularly vulnerable. “We’re seeing retailers pull back on inventory orders and extend payment terms with suppliers,” said Sarah Chen, a partner at retail consultancy firm Mercatus Group. “Everyone’s preparing for a potential consumer pullback.”

Political Fallout and Policy Dilemmas

The International Monetary Fund released its pessimistic report during an important time for the Trump administration because it opposes their tough trade policies that support domestic labour and business interests.

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre pushed back against the IMF’s conclusions in a Tuesday briefing.

“President Trump’s policies are designed to create a stronger, more self-sufficient American economy in the long term,”

she said.

“Temporary adjustments are to be expected as we rebalance unfair trade relationships.”

But critics argue the administration is playing with fire.

“This isn’t economic policy – it’s economic Russian roulette,” said former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers in a CNN interview.

The risks far outweigh any potential benefits.”

The Federal Reserve System currently makes a complex decision between inflation control and economic growth support. The Federal Open Market Committee faces a challenging decision since inflation is rising, but economic growth is decelerating, which would divide their usually unified approach to monetary policy decisions.